女生喝什么茶对身体好
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 1. |
DRN
editGladiator and Fall...
editGood to know someone else notices such things, not only an 'elephant' who saw the first Telstar broadcast from Europe to the US, first NBC color transmission, first The Flintstones studio preview, and Nikita Khrushchev's infamous visit to the Can-Can (film) set. Cheers! Shir-El too 21:37, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
You're an idiot
editDear buddy, I just posted revolutionary information to wikipedia and the only thing you can think about is being offended. You're an idiot that's operating way out of their league. Congratulations on blocking revolutionary information. Do everyone a favor and stop editing wikipedia.
curprev 08:21, 10 August 2025 Ianmacm talk contribs 70,038 bytes ?1,216 please read WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL undo Tag: Undo 69.14.4.153 (talk) 13:55, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oh for goodness sake, you are very lucky not to have been blocked for WP:3RR and WP:NPA by now. I'm not sure how a page on Github is going to convince anyone that the Riemannn hypothesis has been proved. Dream on.--?IanMacM? (talk to me) 13:58, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- I don't care about convincing other people. What I posted is the truth and that's all that matters. The burden is on you to refute the evidence. You might want to double, triple and quadruple check what was posted is true or not. Your dismissive attitude without even checking the solution is going to prove you foolish. 69.14.4.153 (talk) 14:02, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- 69.14.4.153, just because you may be an expert in the field or because you may be right does not allow you to edit war and make personal attacks. We are here to build an encyclopedia, not to promote our own discoveries; adding your proof of the Riemann hypothesis is likely to be repeatedly removed (and it already has) as it constitutes original research, which Wikipedia does not publish. The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion, nor is it a place to "win". Please stop. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 14:43, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- I don't care about convincing other people. What I posted is the truth and that's all that matters. The burden is on you to refute the evidence. You might want to double, triple and quadruple check what was posted is true or not. Your dismissive attitude without even checking the solution is going to prove you foolish. 69.14.4.153 (talk) 14:02, 10 August 2025 (UTC)